This abortion propaganda has been shared over 100,000 times, and needs answering properly. Wherever you see it, put the link to this post in the comments, then watch the death cult rage. GoodSauce.news/murdering-babies
Thereโs a pro-abortion social media post thatโs been shared tens of thousands of times that says, โIโm not pro-murdering babies. Iโm pro-Becky. Iโm pro-Susan. Iโm pro-Theresa, Cathy, Melissa, Brittany, Emily,โ and other hypothetical women it lists.
And after each name it gives a hypothetical scenario in which the anonymous propagandist writing describes a circumstance in which he or she believes murdering that womanโs baby IS something they are pro.
The propagandist concludes that she is pro life, but then hastens to clarify they are only pro some lives, clearly not the lives of babies, but just Jessica, Vanessa, Lindsay, Courtney, Jamie and the other hypothetical women facing perhaps the worst day of their lives.
The propagandist concludes with claims she cannot consistently apply. She says we โdonโt get to pick and choose which scenarios should be accepted,โ that itโs not about the few situations we disagree with, but the choice being available to women whose stories we do agree justify intentionally murdering babies.
The propagandist claims womenโs rights are meant to protect ALL women, regardless of their situation. Except that means that the womanโs alleged right to make an arbitrary choice to kill her preborn baby girl immediately violates another womanโs right to not be murdered, which most normal people agree is an important one.
Perhaps the propagandist means womenโs rights are for all women regardless of their situation unless their situation is a womb, in which case not that that situation. That woman has no right to womenโs rights because her situation is one pro-abortionists apparently DO get to pick and choose does not deserve womenโs rights.
The clearly pro-murdering babies propagandist is not pro Phoebe, Zoe, Angela or the at least 30 million other female babies I could name which have been murdered in the situation she has picked where womenโs rights do not protect ALL women.
The propagandist has proven she really does believe society encounters competing rights which have to be resolved through a philosophical belief system and an ethical framework to inform which rights have precedent and priority in certain situations.
Her ethical system is the radical pro abortion philosophy, which doesnโt debate the biological fact that every human life began at fertilisation, but doesnโt care that their choice will deliberately kill an innocent living human.
This social media post doing the rounds is actually a desperate and willfully ignorant attempt to rationalise murdering babies, a fact the propagandist denied in her opening line.
So having demolished the propagandistโs claim to sincerity, compassion, or logical coherence, letโs have a look at each situation proposed where she says sheโs pro murdering babies.
๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฌ๐บ ๐ง๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ข๐ต ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ 20 ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ต๐ฐ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ด๐ค๐ข๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ง๐ข๐ฏ๐ต ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ด๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐น๐ค๐ช๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ญ๐ช๐ง๐ฆ ๐ด๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฐ๐ณ๐จ๐ข๐ฏ๐ด.
First, letโs get one thing straight. The one thing anti-abortion activists like me have a problem with is elective abortion procedures where the preferred outcome is a dead baby. Abortion as contraception is a horrifically barbaric prioritisation of adult desires for sex without consequences. You explicitly gave your consent to the possibility of pregnancy when you had intercourse knowing it could result in pregnancy, however small you felt the chance was. Killing your baby because you would prefer to not be pregnant is the moral bankruptcy people like me are opposed to.
Whatโs happening to Becky is horrible, and deserves compassion. She should be informed of the high rate at which doctors misdiagnose congenital conditions and a perfectly healthy baby is born. One of my kids is one such person, now finishing high school in perfect health. If we hadโve followed medical advice with an early diagnosis we would have killed him before he was born, devastating his whole family and robbing the world of his contribution.
Of course, genuine congenital conditions happen, perhaps far more often than doctors get it wrong, and live mere hours after delivery. The opportunity for Becky to have precious hours of life with her daughter, to hold her, name her, maybe put the tiny baby clothes on her bought long ago, then comfort her as she passes is a heart-wrenchingly beautiful moment Becky and her baby deserve.
It is a perverse morality that devalues a life of suffering from a life of privilege. Millions of people have been inspired, motivated and genuinely helped by people born with no arms or legs which pro-abortionists would have excused the prenatal murder of.
๐๐ถ๐ด๐ข๐ฏ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ด๐ฆ๐น๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ข๐ด๐ด๐ข๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฌ, ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ช๐ง๐ช๐ค ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ป๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ข๐ด๐ด๐ข๐ช๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ข ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐บ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ด๐ต ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฉ ๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ.
Executing a child for the crime of her father is not justice. Blaming the victim is something the pro-abortionists would rightfully decry as shameful if Susan was asked any questions about what she was wearing or the risks she was taking, but they happily rationalise another violent crime being committed against the new living human existing in the safety of her womb.
Susanโs trauma will not be diminished by the death of her baby. Most women who conceive in rape want to keep their baby. Having had their sense of personal power violated and destroyed by the criminal, they often find a new sense of ability to protect their baby they canโt recover any other way. That is the undeniable mothering instinct which, if shattered by abortion, is just another trauma and violation she will bear for the rest of her life.
And even if, in her mental anguish and suffering, Susan might make the choice to have an abortion, it can hardly be claimed her decision-making ability was not impaired beyong the possibility of informed consent, with full appreciation of the potential for exacerbation of her existing trauma the choice was intended to avoid.
Objectively speaking, pro-abortionists โotherโ preborn people, and devalue their worth, dignity and human rights. They claim Susanโs potential suffering when reminded of her babyโs conception is greater than her babyโs suffering when executed by an abortionist.
Itโs a preposterous claim pro-abortionists frequently assert, that itโs better to be killed than to experience suffering. Such a claim reeks of power and privilege. The post-modern, cultish obsession with abortion and euthanasia โrightsโ are an affluent Western indulgence; one which most of world history and modern developing nations would reject when told their existence is insufferable and death would be preferable to relative poverty, abuse or anguish. Billions of people throughout history have fought and struggled and continue to eek out an existence facing insurmountable odds, persevering while the tiny flame of hope continues to flicker. Killing them isnโt helping them. Death isnโt therapy.
๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ข ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฉ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ข ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ค๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ, ๐ค๐ข๐ถ๐ด๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ด, ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ด๐ช๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ด๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ด๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฏ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ.
This is just a nonsense. For a start, the family would never be given this option. Basic triage would dictate the medical professionals save the mother if at all possible, and the baby would then be given whatever medical assistance a premmie baby with full dignity and human rights deserves, and no anti-abortion activist would argue if the necessary actions couldnโt save the baby. Intentions matter. Pro-life is not anti-triage.
L๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ญ๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ต๐ฉ๐บ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ช๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ต๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ 11 ๐บ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐บ ๐ช๐ด๐ฏ’๐ต ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ถ๐จ๐ฉ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐บ๐ข๐ญ.
Again, triage. A tragedy has happened, and it is not solved by radical pro-abortion intentions. Doctors will not risk Cathyโs life, and pro-lifers will not argue.
But as a percentage, how many abortions are conducted each year in your affluent, Western nation, where this is the story? This is disgusting appropriation of incredible suffering for radical abortion-on-demand agendas. If they were only opposed to banning abortions in situations like this they might be taken seriously, because situations really do matter.
If someone comes into my house, cannot be reasoned with, and intends to kill my family or me, I will use reasonable force to stop him. If he accidentally dies in the struggle, that was not my intent, and I am not guilty of murder, and that is coherently pro-life.
What radical pro-abortion activists want is the right to abortion on demand, knowing full well an innocent living human is being murdered on purpose as the intended outcome. They donโt care about Cathy at all, and are just shamelessly exploiting her to rationalise the fact they really are pro-murdering babies.
๐๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ด๐ด๐ข ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ’๐ด ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฌ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ธ๐ฐ ๐ซ๐ฐ๐ฃ๐ด ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ด ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ต ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ต๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ต๐บ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ง๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ญ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐บ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ค๐ข๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ.
I mean, this oneโs not even hard. Melissa: youโre pregnant. You canโt say youโre not ready to have kids. You canโt say you didnโt know sex sometimes makes babies. You live in a world with many, many, many people who are willing to help you and if you really donโt want that baby, raise and care for her for you. I donโt think you want the right to murder your baby. I think you want support to make sure they are safe, sheltered, clothed, fed and educated. Letโs take murder off the table as a no-brainer, and not attempt to rationalise it with potential suffering if society fails you in all other solutions. You have no idea what tomorrow holds, and certainly cannot know your new baby has no hope for all the basics you hope she will have.
Of course communities and congregations all need to take a long hard look at how we are promoting and supporting mothers and giving hope to abortion-vulnerable women amongst us, but that is never a valid argument for murdering babies.
๐๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ข๐ฏ๐บ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ป๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฏ๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ง๐ช๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ, ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ, ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ฉ๐บ๐ด๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ณ๐ข๐ช๐ด๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ.
This is nearly the same as above. Brittany, high school sex education by woke leftists failed you. They should have taught you and your babyโs father that sex can make babies, and if youโre not financially, emotionally or physically ready to raise a child, then youโre not ready to have sex.
And again, the failure of families, congregations and communities to pre-emptively promise people who are abortion-vulnerable that they will not be alone or unsupported is not a valid argument for killing their babies.
Brittany, youโre not the first scared mother-to-be, and you wonโt be the last. Your baby is real, alive, has a beating heart, unique DNA, and is a new living human. You will forever regret killing him if you make that choice. You can still graduate high school, college and have a fulfilling career at the same time as being a wonderful mother to him. You can do this. You really can. Youโre not alone, you donโt have to do this alone, and there are many people who want to help you and support you to be the best mother you can be, and that is all he really needs from you – just your best.
๐๐ฎ๐ช๐ญ๐บ ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ถ๐จ๐ฉ ๐๐๐, ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐๐๐ ๐ท๐ช๐ข๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐จ๐จ๐ด ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ช๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ข๐ง๐ฆ๐ต๐บ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ข ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ง๐ฆ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ๐ด.
96% of biologists agree every human life starts at fertilisation. The other 4% are lying because of their radical pro abortion politics. The only SAFE way to have IVF is to not create any more human lives than you can safely carry to term. Every deliberately destroyed embryo is a unique living human already with unique DNA very clearly not the motherโs body. None of them think selective reduction is safe.
๐๐ฆ๐ด๐ด๐ช๐ค๐ข ๐ช๐ด ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ต๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐จ๐ต๐ฉ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ต ๐ข๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ฉ๐บ๐ด๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ถ๐ด๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ง๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ค๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐บ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ’๐ด ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ.
Here we go again, radical pro-aboriton activists othering a powerless, innocent victim, calling them a โmonsterโs childโ, and blaming the victim. Jessica needs help, not harm. Donโt fail Jessica. Support her and her baby to be safe, sheltered, clothed and fed. The monster who physically abused her is half the sociopathic evil of the monsters rationalising the murder of her baby based on someone elseโs crimes.
๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ด๐ด๐ข ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ง๐ช๐ณ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ข๐ง๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ณ๐บ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ด๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต.
If the baby is already dead there is no direct abortion. Yes, itโs technically the same procedure, but no, itโs a vastly different intent. There is no intent to murder a baby. No anti-abortion activist like me would deny Vanessa the medical care necessary to avoid scepsis or other complications once the baby is confirmed already dead.
๐๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ด๐ข๐บ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ท๐ช๐ณ๐จ๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐บ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ข ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ๐ณ.
Lindsay, Iโm sorry high school sex education by woke leftists failed you. They should have taught you and your babyโs father that even sex with condoms and the pill can make babies, and if youโre not financially, emotionally or physically ready to raise a child, then youโre not ready to have sex.
Youโre not the first scared mother-to-be, and you wonโt be the last – just ask Brittany. You can still graduate high school, college and have a fulfilling career at the same time as being a wonderful mother to him.
Your teenage years wonโt be the same as your friends, but they wonโt be worse: just different. You are no longer the centre of your world, your baby is. Most of your friends will adore him, and many will change their plans to include and consider you and him.
And when they donโt, understand they werenโt forever friends anyway, unlike this bundle of joy you will spend the rest of your life loving. Anyone who truly loves you will warn you that you will spend the rest of your life regretting killing your first baby, and those are your real choices.
๐๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ต๐ฏ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ง๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ’๐ด ๐ข๐ญ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐บ 13 ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ด ๐ข๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐จ, ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐จ๐จ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ช๐ข๐ฏ ๐ต๐ถ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐บ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ช๐ด๐ฌ๐ด ๐ฅ๐บ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ.
Yet again, a vastly different intent. There is no intent to murder a baby. No anti-abortion activist like me would deny Courtney the medical care necessary to solve an indisputable and immediate probability of fatality.
๐๐ข๐ช๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ฏ-๐ฃ๐ช๐ฏ๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐ช๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ต ๐ด๐ช๐จ๐ฏ๐ช๐ง๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ญ๐บ ๐ฉ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ช๐ด๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ด๐ถ๐ช๐ค๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ถ๐จ๐ฉ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐บ ๐ฅ๐บ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ช๐ข ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ข ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐บ, ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฅ๐บ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ช๐ข.
Jaime wasnโt assigned female at birth. That is propaganda. Jaime was observed female at birth. Thatโs science. The big clue is she can get pregnant. Sheโs at a significantly higher risk of suicide because sheโs suffering a mental health condition that needs both authentic compassion and honesty, neither of which she will ever get from a woke leftist pro-abortion activist. Virtue signalling in buckets, but no honesty. Without an accurate diagnosis Jaime cannot be helped effectively. The emotional trauma of killing her baby will exacerbate her mental health symptoms, not mitigate them.
Post-abortion syndrome was widely recognised and treated until DSM4, when it was censored from science. Despite activist claims to the contrary, there are now at least 24 published studies linking abortion trauma to substance abuse, and more research linking abortion to psychiatric illness, depression, PTSD, relationship problems, domestic violence and premature death through suicide, accidents, homicide and natural causes. Itโs a trauma pro-abortion activists have perpetuated a stigma of making it harder to find recognition, therapy and support for.
Jaime needs real help, not platitudes and patronising.
The propagandist who wrote this verbal diarrhea has mastered the art of manipulative rhetoric devoid of all facts and logic to a level the most genocidal of historical regimes would find a position for.
In this modern era with such advances in both science and human rights advocacy, there are only two main reasons someone is still pro-abortion.
The first is that they have been sheltered by progressive curriculum in government indoctrination centres previously called schools from what 96% of biologists can honestly observe, and that is that your life, and that of everyone you know, began at the precise moment your daddyโs sperm won the race to your mammaโs ovum. Human life begins at fertilisation. Thatโs not philosophy or faith or politics. Thatโs observable, empirical, repeatable science. Abortion-on-demand is always the deliberate killing of a living human being.
The second reason someone might still be as backward as a pro-slavery activist is that they know full well they are talking about a second, unique living human beingโs life and death, and they just donโt care.
They have relegated an entire class of people to mere property; possessions belonging to someone more powerful and privileged, and able to be killed for whatever arbitrary reason the owner decides is good enough. These are the radicals, the apologists for a barbaric industry that, in America alone over the last 50 years, has killed 10 times more people than Hitler. And they donโt even feel any shame.
If you are pro-abortion, you are as certainly on the wrong side of history as the Supreme Court was when they ruled in favour of slavery as a constitutional right. If you are silent about the evil human rights violations of the abortion industry, you are as complicit as the people watching the smoke rise and the ash fall from the extermination chambers in 1940s Germany, who said nothing.
Neither science nor legal precedents nor history can be called as witnesses to support the claim to a right to murder babies.
My generation will end abortion.
Be part of the solution
This content is produced and published without censorship or paywall by the team at The Good Sauce, thanks to the Good Sauce Supporters. If youโd like to be part of the solution by helping us produce more truthful content like this, become a Good Sauce supporter today.
Dave Pellowe is a Christian conservative writer & commentator, editor of The Good Sauce, and convener of the annual Church And State Summit. He believes in natural law & freedoms, objective Truth & justice, personal responsibility & voluntary charity, strong nations & families, free markets & small government. Dave's show, "Pellowe Talk", offers honest insights on important public issues & ideas, as well as informative long-form interviews with experts and insiders. Many of Dave's articles are syndicated across Australia and New Zealand. [more]