WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comments below...

You can enjoy more Good Sauce articles and shows by subscribing to the Good Sauce podcast on Apple, Google, Spotify, Amazon and more. Please take a minute to help us reach more people by giving us a 5 star rating and review in Apple Podcasts.




My assessment of Donald Trump as one of the greatest American presidents at least since Ronald Reagan, confirmed by his superb C-Pac speech, attracted  a version of the elites’ current default critical-race-theory response: ‘You racist jerk’. 

Racist? In my youth, the front-page banner on the nation’s leading journal demanded   ‘Australia for the White Man’. I would often be reminded of my origin even by adult strangers.  

I have always resisted playing the victim,  especially over jocular banter which the lazier London media so long pretended was shocking when uttered by Prince Philip. 

But for the 1998 Convention Election campaign, I did mention my origins. Reprimanded by Fairfax, I explained this was to counter their dismissal of the Crown as alien and white. Then, a few years ago, a site promoting a politicians’ republic regularly damned me as that  ‘perma-tanned Indonesian-born blow-in’.  

A gift indeed, a great way to begin an after-dinner speech.   

Critical-race-theory is but one of the myths pouring out of American universities.  Its strongest proponent is the party of slavery and segregation, led by the White House Pretender who himself emerged as a prominent segregationist Senator and who now declares that any African American daring not to vote for him is not Black. 

All these myths are part of the neo-Marxist armoury designed to bring down Western civilisation. The priority of the cabal of ‘important people’ recently revealed by TIME was  not only to remove Trump, but it is also to ensure no other outsider ever dares disempower their swamp. What unites them is the veritable cornucopia Beijing offers, even if the price is US and Western decline.   

Pseudo-scientific, these myths are slipped into the curriculum by our captured teaching institutions, no matter which party is in power. Orwellian Newspeak is typically used to limit discourse to approved thought. Thus using ‘gender’ instead of ‘sex’ concedes that being a man or woman is not determined at birth but by choice. This has consequences illustrated by the fact that the Pretender has, by a stroke of his pen, destroyed women’s sport as well as the security of women’s lavatories etc.  

Resistance is sanctioned, if not by law, by the social media, key members of TIME’s cabal. 

 ( Incidentally full marks to the Australian government for so successfully standing up to the anti-Trump social media monopolists.)   

The central myth today is the discredited theory of anthropogenic  ‘global warming’. Because warming inconveniently stalled, Newspeak now uses ‘climate change’. According to a UN functionary in a moment of candour, its true purpose is to impose a global socialist model. Although Beijing has promised net-zero emissions, just as they promise not to commit genocide, they are laughing all the way to this nation’s downfall, building last year more than three times as much new coal power capacity as all other countries combined.  

Recently, while the marine band played Amazing Grace, the mass-going rosary-carrying Pretender honoured the 500,000 Americans said to have died from (or more likely with) the Wuhan virus. But when he restored US$9 billion in foreign aid to abort or kill foreign babies previously disallowed by strong right-to-life President Trump, no band played for the 30 million babies, disproportionately black, killed under the Supreme Court’s invention of a constitutional right based on the myth of women’s choice. This was an early example of a neo-Marxist weapon, part of their culture of death. Notice that they are never content with the level of death achieved, with some laws legalising the killing of babies surviving abortion.   

Such is the power of the delinquent US mainstream media, even conservative commentators seem obliged to attack Trump over two things, his daring to question the integrity of the election but also, what can best be described as his lack of the sort of gravitas attained by the Pretender or by Barrack Obama.  

 As to the election, US commentator Sebastian Gorka explained to Andrew Bolt on Sky in late February that rather than Trump having no evidence of fraud he had a veritable mountain which judges curiously found technical reasons not even to hear. This judicial reluctance was repeated recently when  six Supreme Court justices  scandalously ducked cleaning up for the future concerning  blatant constitutional breaches in changing electoral law. The six sadly included two Trump appointments, Kavanagh and Barrett.  

The fact is Trump was not only entitled to raise election integrity,  he had a moral and constitutional duty to do so. 

Common sense indicates that, as with credit cards, any opening for fraud will be used. The more you move away from the polling station-based secret (or Australian)  ballot , the more fraud is deliberately enabled. And when politicians talk about making voting easier, the more they want to make fraud easier. The Australian governments’ decision to experiment in the names of some voters being struck off on an electronic roll is suspiciously tame. This should be universal at the next election as should photo-identification on voting and especially registration. Expressing preferences should be optional and the elections should only be on one day.    

As to Trump not having gravitas, he never claimed his inauguration would stop global warming, he never used the IRS against opponents,  he never wiretapped an opponent on fraudulent grounds, he never funded Iran to develop nuclear energy nor derailed  action against their Hezbollah client when they were funnelling cocaine into the US, he never abandoned diplomats attacked by terrorists in a US embassy nor lie about the reason, he never unleashed a war, he never broke  his promise to move the embassy to Jerusalem, he never hid from the media, he never allowed anyone in his administration to sell access and influence to foreign oligarchs, he never promised Russia that he would go soft after the election, he never threw the borders open nor did he ever fail to act to prevent the theft and transfer of IP to Beijing.   

He did none of these things.  Instead, he made America and the West great again. And, God willing, the best is yet to come.   


[ This is based on a piece which  appeared in Spectator Australia on 6 March 2021] 

Click here for more info on how to take back your country.

Professor David Flint AM is an emeritus professor of law and was chairman of the Australian Broadcasting Authority and the Australian Press Council, president of the National Federation of the English Speaking Union, Associate Commissioner with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and convenor of the Committee of Australian Law Deans. He has been National Convenor of Australians for Constitutional Monarchy since the 1999 referendum campaign. He has authored books on topics such as the media, international economic law and on the Constitution. At Barcelona in 1991 he received a World Jurist Association award as World Outstanding Legal Scholar. He was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 1995. His Good Sauce show,Take Back Your Country, discusses the problems and solutions to the decay of federalism and democracy.

News & views you can trust

Conservative voices are constantly being deplatformed and shadow-banned from the most popular social media platforms. Like & follow is no guarantee you'll see the posts you need & want.

The only guaranteed way to guard against corporate censorship is to go direct to the source and bypass the strangers deciding what you shouldn't see & read.

To get a regular digest of articles, interviews & news direct to your inbox SUBSCRIBE NOW!

You have Successfully Subscribed!